I’m reading 419 by Will Ferguson—a powerful story,
well told, with turns of phrase that delight.
“Storms without rain. Winds without water.
She woke, and when she sat up, the dust fountained off her and the voice that
accompanied her once again stirred, once again whispered, “Get up. Keep
walking. Don’t stop.”
Vivid imagery abounds.
“Zuma rock
denoted not only the traditional geographical centre of Nigeria-the “navel of
the nation” as it was known-but also the border between the sha’ria states of
the north and the Christian states of the sough. Zuma rose up, rounded and
sudden, on striated cliffs etched by a thousand years of rainfall and erosion.
The ridges carved down its sides were the sort of lines that might be left by
acid or tears.”
A woman from Canada, a girl from the north, a young
man from the Delta, and a 419er. How will the lives of these disparate
characters be woven together? I’m fascinated, enthralled, eager to read each
evening, yet dreading the end, dreading the time when the story will be only a
memory. The narrative makes me cringe and cry. I know this is a book I will
read more than once.
I email my young Nigerian friend to tell him about
the novel. He responds:
“ 419 - an internet scam organized by Nigerian
scammers (aliases: Yahoo Boys, G-Boys). 419 is an alias that dates back to the
past (I believe 1994-1997) in Nigeria, when innocent people, mainly teenagers,
were repeatedly abducted and killed. Their bodies or body parts were then used
for big money rituals.
I've come across painful remarks on Twitter, Facebook, and some other interactive sites about Nigerians being fraudsters. That they target white people and rob them of their money using various means; including telling them pitiful stories just to incite their help.”
I've come across painful remarks on Twitter, Facebook, and some other interactive sites about Nigerians being fraudsters. That they target white people and rob them of their money using various means; including telling them pitiful stories just to incite their help.”
I’m about three quarters of the way through the book
at this point and the urge to learn more about Ferguson’s research can no
longer be ignored. Goggling proves to be a huge mistake. The first items that
come up are reviews from highly respected sources, and while they don’t
lambaste the book, they do contain enough negative comments to diminish my
pleasure in the reading and cause a rather sour feeling.
I turn away from the computer in disgust, push the
reviews out of my mind, and return to my Kindle. I refuse to let someone else’s
opinion color my own judgment, my own enjoyment of the novel.
Sitting now, writing this, I wonder if I should stop
writing reviews. Am I guilty of spoiling another’s enjoyment, of perhaps
causing someone, because of my arrogance, to dismiss a novel without even
giving it a chance? Conversely, does a review I write of a book I love convince
a reader to pick up that book only to find that it doesn’t work for them? What
makes me think I can or should pass judgment for another reader?
But the author in me craves reviews. They’re our
“word of mouth” and vital to marketing. If we’re to have sales at all, we need
people talking about our books, reviewing them, recommending them to fellow
readers.
Amazon sends me emails. “So, Darlene Jones, how did this item meet your expectations?” Do I answer? What do I say? My own sister,
daughter, and aunt don’t always like the books I deem worthy of their time.
Yes, I did write a
review for 419. Book buyers may or may not read it. They may or may not take it
to heart in their decision making, but I’ve decided writing reviews is my
obligation to fellow authors. It’s my “word of mouth” gift to them. I hope
readers of my books will do the same for me.